Weeks, not quarters.
A repeatable four-step engagement. The same shape for a pricing model, a forecasting system, or a document workflow — what changes is the metric we're moving and the data we're moving it with.
From problem to production.
Identify
Map workflows, shortlist candidate decisions by feasibility and value, and pick the one or two we'd put real money behind.
Design
Map data, workflow, and ownership. Lock the metric we're moving and the criteria for success before any code is written.
Deploy
Build a focused MVP, instrument it, and put it in front of real users. Iterate against the metric — not against the demo.
Adopt
Train the people in the workflow, set up internal champions, and stay on long enough that adoption survives our exit.
The non-negotiables.
Metric before model.
If we can't agree on what we're moving and how we'd measure it, we don't take the work — no exceptions, no "we'll figure it out in flight".
Build narrow, learn fast.
A small system in production beats a large one on a roadmap. The first MVP is intentionally smaller than the team would like.
Adoption is the deliverable.
Engagement isn't done at deploy. It's done when the workflow runs without us in the room.
Direct over decorative.
Plain language, defensible numbers, and one chart that says the thing instead of three that suggest it.
Questions teams ask before signing.
How long is a typical engagement?
Do you work with our existing data and tooling?
Can you sign an MSA / handle procurement?
Do you build models from scratch or use foundation models?
What does pricing look like?
Start with a discovery session.
We'd rather scope a focused engagement around a single decision than promise a transformation. The second use case finds itself.